Most creators treat pitching like a mood. It isn’t. It’s a numbers system with three levers — volume, conversion, and follow-up — and once you can see the math, “brands aren’t responding” stops being a feeling and becomes a diagnosis you can fix. Let’s run it.
- Landing deals is a funnel: pitches → replies → calls → deals. Fix the stage that’s actually leaking.
- Track every pitch. What feels like “hundreds” is usually 30–50.
- Follow-ups (email 2 and 3) convert better than the first send. Skipping them halves your output.
- Channel quality beats channel quantity — cold outreach and agencies scale; saturated apps don’t.
Pitching is a funnel, not a vibe
Every deal you land passed through the same four stages: a pitch went out, it got a reply, the reply turned into a conversation, and the conversation closed. Each stage has a conversion rate. If you don’t know your numbers, you’re optimizing blind — tweaking your portfolio when the leak is actually your subject line, or blaming your rate when the real problem is you sent eight emails and called it a campaign.
| Stage | What it measures | If it’s leaking, fix… |
|---|---|---|
| Pitch → open | Subject line + right inbox | Subject line, and who you email |
| Open → reply | Relevance of the offer | Your concept and the gap you found |
| Reply → call | Follow-up + clarity | Follow-up cadence, a clear next step |
| Call → deal | Fit + pricing | Targeting better-fit brands |
Track everything (you send fewer than you think)
Ask any creator how much they pitch and you’ll hear “a ton.” Make them count, and “hundreds a day” collapses to 30–50 a week. The number in your head is fiction; the number in a spreadsheet is strategy. Serious operators send around 300 pitches a week — and because they log them, they can see which subject lines get opened and which intros get replies. Tracking doesn’t just measure the system, it improves it.
The follow-up multiplier
Here’s the single cheapest win in the whole funnel: your second and third emails outperform the first. One send isn’t a pitch, it’s a coin flip. Most people never follow up, which means most people are voluntarily deleting half their pipeline. Build the follow-up into the system — two or three touches per brand — and your reply rate climbs without a single extra brand added to the list.
Spend your volume where it converts
Volume only compounds on a good channel. Ranked by leverage:
- Cold outreach — you control it, and it builds direct relationships you can turn into retainers. Highest ceiling.
- Agencies — one relationship, steady flow of briefs once you’re in.
- Upwork — inconsistent, but real deals exist if you vet them.
- UGC apps — oversaturated and price-suppressed. Fine to build a portfolio; a bad place to build income.
And target medium-sized brands: big names lose you in the pile, tiny ones have no budget. Medium brands have money and still see you.
The uncomfortable input
Run the math honestly and one truth falls out: early on, the conversion rates are low, so the only lever you fully control is volume — and it can take months and hundreds of pitches before the first paid deal clears. That’s not failure, that’s the funnel filling. The creators who make it aren’t the talented ones; they’re the ones who kept feeding a tracked system long enough for the rates to reveal themselves.
Frequently asked questions
How many pitches does one deal actually take?
It depends on your conversion rates — which is exactly why you track. Early on, expect it to take real volume; the point of logging is to watch that number drop as your system tightens.
What’s the highest-leverage fix if nothing’s landing?
Add follow-ups. It’s the cheapest change and usually the biggest jump in reply rate.
Should I use UGC apps?
To build a portfolio, sure. To build income, no — they suppress price and block the direct relationships that scale.
Ready to get paid to make videos?
Join Nate’s free live UGC masterclass and get the exact system to land your first paid brand deal.